American boys have become less supportive of gender equality
A survey of 8th and 10th graders shows a sharp drop in the percent of boys who believe that women should have the same opportunities as men
May 5, 2025, two quick updates:
First, the analysis script and summary data is available here.
Second, I've realized that there was a mode change that I failed to note in the initial post. The Monitoring the Future survey switched from paper forms to electronics tablets between 2018 and 2020. Although most users of this dataset ignore this change, its effects can be estimated.
Based on 2019 data, where both modes were tested together, the mode change could account for a 1.5 points of the 15.2 point drop in complete agreement on the equal pay question, and 5.6 of the 17.8 point drop on the equal opportunity question.
The critically-acclaimed Netflix show, Adolescence, has stoked public conversation about the problem of misogyny and violence among school-aged boys. It’s been discussed in op-eds, on morning shows and by the British Prime Minister. Many commentators accept the show’s fictional portrayal of a 14-year-old boy’s descent into a misogynist online subculture as representative of real social trends. But until now, there’s been little hard evidence of this trend, leaving room for some to claim that concern about increasing sexism among boys is just a moral panic.
Unfortunately, the trend appears to be real. The long-running Monitoring the Future study has been surveying 8th and 10th graders since 1991, and shows a sharp drop in the proportion of 8th and 10th graders that believe in gender equality in the last five years.
In 2018, 84% of 8th and 10th grade boys agreed that women should have the same job opportunities as men. But in the last five years, the number dropped to 72%. The proportion of boys who completely agreed (as opposed to “mostly agree”) saw an even steeper drop, from 63% to 45%.
The share of boys agreeing that women deserve equal pay also fell from 87% in 2018 to 79% in 2023. The share who agreed completely fell from 72% to 57%.
Is it social media?
Many commentators on the topic of misogyny among boys are quick to blame social media and internet subcultures such as the “manosphere” or “incels”. Some point to evidence that social media algorithms tend to amplify misogynistic content. This particular hypothesis is not confirmed by data from this survey.
In 2018, the survey started asking children about their time spent using social networks, watching videos and playing video games. But it asked only about the amount they spent on each activity, not about the nature of the content they consumed. The data shows that the sharper drops in the share of boys endorsing gender equality occurred in those who spend the least time using social networks.
It also seems that boys who spent the least amount of time watching videos experienced the largest decreases in support for gender equality.
Video games also appear unlikely as a culprit, as again, it was the non-gamers who had the largest decreases in beliefs in gender equality since 2018.
This certainly seems to undercut the popular thesis that social media and the internet are driving changing views on gender equality. It is still possible that these media formats play a role in changing views about gender equality, but it probably isn’t a simple function of the amount of time spent on them.
Social isolation and lack of romantic relationships
Is the decreasing popularity of gender equality related to social isolation? Maybe not in the way people might expect. Gender equality appears to have become less popular among both social and non-social boys, but the decrease appears to have been larger for boys who are more social, not less.
For decades, support for gender equality has been similar for boys who get together with friends informally at least once a week, and those who don’t. But in recent years, as both proportions declined, support among the more social group declined more.
A similar story emerges with respect to dating activity. Contrary to the hypothesis that misogyny is driven by romantic struggles, support for gender equality has typically been lower among boys who go on dates, and has decreased by a similar amount among boys who go on dates and those who don’t.
Absent fathers
One evergreen hypothesis regarding the behavior of boys is that it all relates to the absence of a father figure in the household. But views of gender equality have been almost identical between boys who did or didn’t have a father in the household for the past three decades. And that doesn’t seem to have changed during the current decline.
Education
In general, boys with less educated parents tend to endorse gender equality at lower rates. But this gap has actually closed in recent years, as the decline in egalitarian views has been steeper among boys with college-educated mothers than those with non-college-educated mothers.
Parenting styles
Maybe the communication styles of parents are important? Some boys report being able to discuss any problems they have with their parents, while others are not comfortable discussing everything with their parents. Endorsement of gender equality appears to have fallen regardless of whether boys feel comfortable talking to their parents about their problems.
Religion
Religion is one factor that actually shows some promise in explaining why belief in gender equality has lost ground with boys. Views of gender equality among boys who say religion is not important in their life have not decreased by nearly as much in the past five years. The share of boys agreeing completely that women deserve equal job opportunities fell 22 percentage points, from 60% in 2018 to 38% in 2023. Complete agreement with equal pay for women also fell by 21 percentage points, from 71% to 50%.
The fact that the popularity of gender equality plummeted so much among religious boys seems to be the main clue available in the survey about what factors might be driving this trend. Unfortunately, the survey contains little other information on religious or political beliefs of these 8th and 10th graders, and further research will be necessary to understand what is driving these trends.
Out of curiosity, how many boys were surveyed?
Funny and sad at the same time how self identifying so called "scientist" are playing "pinata". You can even take their blindfold off and point to where the pinata is and still they somehow manage to miss it.
Missing the point by that far is an astounding feat, especially when keeping in mind, that most basic educated people have at least some clue to why boys favor less feminism with each subsequent generation thats closer to reality.
The first goto of pseudoscientists is always ideological limitations. Combine this with intelectual dishonesty and you get junkscience. of course they first blame social media (thats where Andrew Tate is), then social isolation ("boys need to men up and take responsibility"), then absent fathers (exemplified toxic masculinity) , then "education" ("the poor are lacking brainwashing, give us more NGO money"), then religion (I bet they didnt miss the chance to put their antichristian values in):D
A blind child has a better chance of hitting the pinata than these people to explain, why young men turn against feminism. There is no chance they ever will be able to understand why and we shouldnt waste our time trying to explain basic reality to these people. You will not be able to convince the flat-earther either. Its not the job of the judge to convince the murderer off his wrongdoings. It cant be ours to convince these "scientists", that they are not producing scientific studies but ideological propaganda. The claim to be educated, let them figure it out themselves while they are unemployed.
No one is taking social sciences serious anymore and funding is being cut. Social sciences should at least be able to explain social realities to a small kind of degree, but they are usualy absurdly far off. We have seen peak absurdity in the recent years, which brought forth claims like "there are more than two genders", which got supported by other pseudoscientist. Its gonna be a gold mine for future historians to explain the pseudosciences of the early 21st century the same way we nowadays look back on claims on witchcraft.
Any normal thinking non brainwashed person would at least would come up with one basic idea/explanation, thats valid. I.e. that what boys see in real life might no be what manipulated statistics try to narrate or that feminism simply is in fact a hateful racist ideology.
"further research will be necessary to understand" dont bother....they dont have the intellectual equipment to produce a survery that furthers knowledge in any kind of way. In fact, I expect the next survey in this topic will try to reduce the understanding on this topic, by just blatantly lying or using other surveys/studies to prove some "males are toxic, give me more money" propaganda point.
No wonder people think colleges are scams if thats what colleges mostly produce. A good thing Trump made these students (social scientist are those with the most unpaid debt) wageslaves for the rest of their lifes. They need to be punished for the damage and conflict they have brought upon society cause of their childish believes.