Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Meg Prescott's avatar

Out of curiosity, how many boys were surveyed?

Expand full comment
sara's avatar

Funny and sad at the same time how self identifying so called "scientist" are playing "pinata". You can even take their blindfold off and point to where the pinata is and still they somehow manage to miss it.

Missing the point by that far is an astounding feat, especially when keeping in mind, that most basic educated people have at least some clue to why boys favor less feminism with each subsequent generation thats closer to reality.

The first goto of pseudoscientists is always ideological limitations. Combine this with intelectual dishonesty and you get junkscience. of course they first blame social media (thats where Andrew Tate is), then social isolation ("boys need to men up and take responsibility"), then absent fathers (exemplified toxic masculinity) , then "education" ("the poor are lacking brainwashing, give us more NGO money"), then religion (I bet they didnt miss the chance to put their antichristian values in):D

A blind child has a better chance of hitting the pinata than these people to explain, why young men turn against feminism. There is no chance they ever will be able to understand why and we shouldnt waste our time trying to explain basic reality to these people. You will not be able to convince the flat-earther either. Its not the job of the judge to convince the murderer off his wrongdoings. It cant be ours to convince these "scientists", that they are not producing scientific studies but ideological propaganda. The claim to be educated, let them figure it out themselves while they are unemployed.

No one is taking social sciences serious anymore and funding is being cut. Social sciences should at least be able to explain social realities to a small kind of degree, but they are usualy absurdly far off. We have seen peak absurdity in the recent years, which brought forth claims like "there are more than two genders", which got supported by other pseudoscientist. Its gonna be a gold mine for future historians to explain the pseudosciences of the early 21st century the same way we nowadays look back on claims on witchcraft.

Any normal thinking non brainwashed person would at least would come up with one basic idea/explanation, thats valid. I.e. that what boys see in real life might no be what manipulated statistics try to narrate or that feminism simply is in fact a hateful racist ideology.

"further research will be necessary to understand" dont bother....they dont have the intellectual equipment to produce a survery that furthers knowledge in any kind of way. In fact, I expect the next survey in this topic will try to reduce the understanding on this topic, by just blatantly lying or using other surveys/studies to prove some "males are toxic, give me more money" propaganda point.

No wonder people think colleges are scams if thats what colleges mostly produce. A good thing Trump made these students (social scientist are those with the most unpaid debt) wageslaves for the rest of their lifes. They need to be punished for the damage and conflict they have brought upon society cause of their childish believes.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts